Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEte, Hatem
dc.contributor.authorAltunoğlu, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorDalay, Galip
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-18T19:26:58Z
dc.date.available2019-10-18T19:26:58Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1302-177X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11421/11633
dc.descriptionWOS: 000447143000011en_US
dc.description.abstractThe Justice and Development Party's (AK Party) more than 13 years rule has ushered in a debate as to whether the AK Party has become a "dominant party" and if so, whether Turkey is experiencing a new type of party system, a dominant-party system. In this article, we first attempt to denote the terms 'dominant party' and 'dominant-party system,' and to shed light on the distinction between these two terms by drawing on the works of Duverger, Sartori, Pempel, and Greene. This article will then analyse Turkey's experience under the AK Party to determine whether the AK Party can aptly be categorized as a "dominant party," and Turkey as having a "dominant-party system." Relying primarily on Greene's conceptual framework, we contend that it is safe to denote the AK Party as a dominant party and to designate Turkey's political system as a "dominant party system."en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSeta Foundationen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleTurkey under the AK Party Rule: From Dominant Party Politics to Dominant Party System?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalInsight Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnadolu Üniversitesi, Açıköğretim Fakültesi, Yaygın Öğretim Anabilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage171en_US
dc.identifier.endpage192en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record