Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGurbuz, Ilhan
dc.contributor.authorGencler Ozkan, Ayse Mine
dc.contributor.authorAkaydin, Galip
dc.contributor.authorSalihoglu, Ece
dc.contributor.authorGunbatan, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorYesilada, Erdem
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-09T20:59:07Z
dc.date.available2020-07-09T20:59:07Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1300-008X
dc.identifier.issn1303-6106
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1905-13
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11421/24180
dc.descriptionDemirci, Fatih/0000-0003-1497-3017; YESILADA, ERDEM/0000-0002-1348-6033; GENCLER OZKAN, AYSE MINE/0000-0002-2220-0033; Miser Salihoglu, Ece/0000-0003-0681-3566en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000499975800007en_US
dc.description.abstractThe present study was conducted to collect, record, and document local knowledge of medicinal practices in Duzce, a northwestern Anatolian province. To the best of our knowledge, no comprehensive ethnobotanical study has been reported from this province. Information was acquired through semistructured interviews and personal conversations using a questionnaire and numerous guided field trips with local knowledgeable people. For quantitative analyses and comparisons, recorded data such as informant consensus factor (F-IC) and use value (UV) were calculated, respectively. As a result of extensive field studies, 122 taxa were determined as folk medicines; 76 of were wild and 46 were cultivated. the identified medicinal plants were mainly from the family Rosaceae, followed by Compositae, Apiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Solanaceae, respectively. Among the preparations used, liquid forms such as infusions (30.2%) or decoctions (16.4%) represented the most favored ways to administer medicinal plants. Dermatological disorders had the highest F-IC score with a value of 0.75 followed by skeletomuscular (F-IC = 0.7466), gastrointestinal (F-IC = 0.6666), immunological (F-IC = 0.6615), and respiratory (F-IC = 0.6292) system disorders, among others. the most prominent medicinal plants were Urtica dioica (UV = 0.4352), Plantago major (UV = 0.3056), Rubus ulmifolius (UV = 0.2279), and Sambucus ebulus (UV = 0.2279). According to the present study, the number of people who recognize and use the wild plants of Duzce, and those of the rest of Anatolia, is steadily decreasing. the ethnobotanical knowledge cannot be passed to the next generation in its entirety if it is not properly recorded. in addition to this gradual loss of knowledge, modern information pollution and contamination via the popular media highlight the urgent need to record this precious knowledge before it is lost.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)Turkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) [TBAG-108T253]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was financially supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK Grant Number: TBAG-108T253). This study is dedicated to the late pharmacist Nahit Altan in recognition of his interests and contributions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTubitak Scientific & Technical Research Council Turkeyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3906/bot-1905-13en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFolk medicineen_US
dc.subjectDuzceen_US
dc.subjectethnobotanyen_US
dc.subjectTurkish medicinal plantsen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.titleFolk medicine in Duzce Province (Turkey)en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Botanyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnadolu Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage769en_US
dc.identifier.endpage+en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster