Social Validity of Evidence-Based Practices and Emerging Interventions in Autism
![Thumbnail](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2//images/restricted.png)
View/ Open
Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessDate
2017Author
Callahan, KevinHughes, Heather L.
Mehta, Smita
Toussaint, Karen A.
Nichols, Susan M.
Ma, Phoenix S.
Wang, Hui-Ting
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Although social validation of the goals, methods, and outcomes of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in autism treatment is a significant factor in their selection and effective use, EBPs are typically identified on the basis of the technical soundness of research without consideration of social validity. The authors investigated EBPs and emerging treatments identified by the National Autism Center (NAC) and National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders (NPDC) to determine which interventions have evidence of social validity, and the types of social validation addressed. A review of 828 articles cited by the NAC and NPDC determined that only 221 articles (26.7%) demonstrated direct evidence of the measurement of social validation. Of seven social validity categories analyzed, only consumer satisfaction, clinically significant behavioral change, and socially important dependent variables were consistently reported. A list of EBPs with varying levels of social and empirical validation is presented, and implications for future research are discussed.
Source
Focus On Autism and Other Developmental DisabilitiesVolume
32Issue
3Collections
- Makale Koleksiyonu [791]
- Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [8325]
- WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [7605]