dc.contributor.author | Zeyrek, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Demirşahin, I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sevdik-Çallı, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Balaban, H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yalçınkaya, I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Turan, U. D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-18T19:02:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-18T19:02:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 1932432728 -- 9781932432725 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11421/10741 | |
dc.description | 4th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, LAW 2010 -- 15 July 2010 through 16 July 2010 -- Uppsala -- 97826 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we report on the annotation procedures we developed for annotating the Turkish Discourse Bank (TDB), an effort that extends the Penn Discourse Tree Bank (PDTB) annotation style by using it for annotating Turkish discourse. After a brief introduction to the TDB, we describe the annotation cycle and the annotation scheme we developed, defining which parts of the scheme are an extension of the PDTB and which parts are different. We provide inter-coder reliability calculations on the first and second arguments of some connectives and discuss the most important sources of disagreement among annotators | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.title | The annotation scheme of the Turkish Discourse Bank and an evaluation of inconsistent annotations | en_US |
dc.type | conferenceObject | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | ACL 2010 - LAW 2010: 4th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Proceedings | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Anadolu Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 282 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 289 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |