Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÇoban, Gül Ünal
dc.contributor.authorAkpınar, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorBaran, Bahar
dc.contributor.authorSağlam, Merve Kocagül
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorKahyaoğlu, Yasemin
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-19T17:27:38Z
dc.date.available2019-10-19T17:27:38Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1300-1337
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6615
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11421/14638
dc.descriptionWOS: 000391649700002en_US
dc.description.abstractIn science education, creating learning environments supported with technology and students' use of theory-evidence coordination when expressing their ideas is emphasized regarding the development of students' scientific reasoning, critical thinking, decision making skills, and etc. In this process, great responsibilities are fallen to teachers as planner and designer of a learning environment. In this study, it is aimed to assess the training which aims the development of science teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through argumentation practices. In this context; this study evaluated the science teachers' argumentation skills, self-efficacy perceptions towards TPACK and the teachers' views about the training. 37 science teachers working at different cities in Turkey participated in the one group pre-test post-test experimental training study, which was lasted 54 hours during a week. The training is composed of both hand and minds on argumentation practices based on TPACK. The participants joined different activities such as collaborative group works, drama, modeling, thematic games, art activities, problem-based learning, field trips, observation and workshops. In the study, Argumentation Test, TPACK Self Efficacy Belief Scale were used as data collection tools. At the end of the training written views of science teachers towards activities were taken. In the light of the findings, this training was effective on the participants' self-efficacy levels towards technological pedagogical content knowledge. Moreover, this training resulted in a positive change in the participants' views about how a statement could be accepted as an argument. However, the increase in scores of argumentation skills was not significant. Additionally almost all of the participants stated that they found the activities useful and can use in their classes. By considering these results, some suggestions were given.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [115B427]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for supporting this study with project number 115B427.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Education Assocen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.15390/EB.2016.6615en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTechnological Pedagogical Content Knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectArgumentationen_US
dc.subjectProfessional Developmenten_US
dc.subjectScience Teachersen_US
dc.titleThe Evaluation of "Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge based Argumentation Practices" Training for Science Teachersen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEğitim ve Bilim-Education and Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.issue188en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage33en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US]


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster