Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGülmezoğlu, M. Bilginer
dc.contributor.authorDzhafarov, Vakif
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, M
dc.contributor.authorBarkana, Atalay
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-20T14:28:23Z
dc.date.available2019-10-20T14:28:23Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.issn1063-6676
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1109/89.799687
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11421/18119
dc.descriptionWOS: 000083497200002en_US
dc.description.abstractA voice signal contains the psychological and physiological properties of the speaker as well as dialect differences, acoustical environment effects, and phase differences. For these reasons, the same word uttered by different speakers can be very different, In this paper, two theories are developed by considering two optimization criteria applied to both the training set and the test set. The first theory is well known and uses what is called Criterion 1 here and ends up with the average of all vectors belonging to the words in the training set. The second theory is a novel approach and uses what is called Criterion 2 here, and it is used to extract the common properties of all vectors belonging to the words in the training set. It is shown that Criterion 2 is superior to Criterion 1 when the training set is of concern. In Criterion 2, the individual differences are obtained by subtracting a reference vector from other vectors, and individual difference vectors are used to obtain orthogonal vector basis by using Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization method, The common vector is obtained by subtracting projections of any vector of the training set on the orthogonal vectors from this same vector, It is proved that this common vector is unique for any word class in the training set and independent of the chosen reference vector. This common vector is used in isolated word recognition, and it is also shown that Criterion 2 is superior to Criterion 1 for the test set. From the theoretical and experimental study, it is seen that the recognition rates increase as the number of speakers in the training set increases. This means that the common vector obtained from Criterion 2 represents the common properties of a spoken word better than the common or average vector obtained from Criterion 1.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIEEE-Inst Electrical Electronics Engineers Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1109/89.799687en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCommon Vector Approachen_US
dc.subjectSpeech Recognitionen_US
dc.subjectSubspace Methodsen_US
dc.titleA novel approach to isolated word recognitionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalIEEE Transactions On Speech and Audio Processingen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnadolu Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Matematik Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage620en_US
dc.identifier.endpage628en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US]
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDzhafarov, Vakif
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBarkana, Atalay


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster