dc.contributor.author | Arslan, B. G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ergeç, Etem Hakan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-20T21:12:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-20T21:12:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1450-2887 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11421/18968 | |
dc.description.abstract | The comparison of performances of participation banks operating through profit and loss sharing (PLS) paradigm with conventional banks is a matter of discussion in international literature. This study analyzes the efficiencies of 26 private conventional banks and 4 participation banks in 2006 and 2009 through the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method. The DEA results reveal that while 3 out of 10 banks, identified inefficient in 2006, were participation banks, in 2009, only 1 out of 11 banks, identified inefficient, was a participation bank | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Bank Efficiency | en_US |
dc.subject | Banking System | en_US |
dc.subject | Interest-Free Banking | en_US |
dc.subject | Profit And Loss Sharing | en_US |
dc.title | The efficiency of participation and conventional banks in turkey: Using data envelopment analysis | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | International Research Journal of Finance and Economics | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Anadolu Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Bölümü | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 57 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 156 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 168 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US] |