Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDogan, Eyup
dc.contributor.authorUlucak, Recep
dc.contributor.authorKocak, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorIsik, Cem
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-09T20:58:38Z
dc.date.available2020-07-09T20:58:38Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.issn1879-1026
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11421/23931
dc.descriptionUlucak, Recep/0000-0001-9938-0063; Dogan, Eyup/0000-0003-0476-5177en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000535463800015en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 32217396en_US
dc.description.abstractA vast body of literature estimates the impact of economic growth on environmental degradation in the framework of EKC model. Typical empirical studies proxy environmental degradation with CO2 emissions; however, this indicator does not consider the complex nature of environmental degradation. To fulfill this omission, ecological footprint that tracks the use of multiple categories of productive surface areas is used as proxy for the environment. Moreover, studies that do not consider issues of heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence may not produce reliable outcomes. Hence, the present study re-investigates the validity of the EKC hypothesis for BRICST (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Turkey) by using ecological footprint and considering the mentioned issues in the estimation process. Based on the annual data covering the period of 1980-2014, excluding Russia due to data unavailability, empirical results show that the EKC hypothesis is not valid, and energy intensity and energy structure are important determinants of environmental degradation. in line with the empirical outputs, possible policy suggestions are discussed in the present study. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Kuznets Curve hypothesisen_US
dc.subjectEcological footprinten_US
dc.subjectBRICST economiesen_US
dc.subjectPanel dataen_US
dc.titleThe use of ecological footprint in estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneityen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalScience of the Total Environmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnadolu Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume723en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster