Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaralik, Tuncay
dc.contributor.authorMerc, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-09T20:59:07Z
dc.date.available2020-07-09T20:59:07Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2149-1135
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.651387
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11421/24181
dc.descriptionWOS: 000499067000002en_US
dc.description.abstractThe present meta-analysis aimed to explore the correlates of listening comprehension in first (L1) and second language (L2). in this regard, the overall average correlation scores, obtained from several primary studies retrieved from several databases, between linguistic (vocabulary size, vocabulary depth, syntactic knowledge), cognitive (working memory, metacognitive skills), and affective factors (anxiety and self-concept) and oral comprehension were measured. the results of the analysis revealed that in terms of strengths of association with listening comprehension, linguistic correlates were superior to cognitive correlates in L2 listening comprehension. There existed positive correlations with large effect sizes between vocabulary and grammar knowledge and listening comprehension while working memory yielded a positive correlation with a small effect size. Metacognitive skills, on the other hand, demonstrated a positive correlation with L2 listening comprehension with a large effect size. A similar pattern was observed in L1 listening comprehension with smaller strengths of association. Vocabulary and grammar knowledge yielded positive correlations with L1 listening comprehension and the effect size was medium while working memory weakly correlated with listening comprehension. An important distinction between L1 and L2 listening comprehension was observed in the affective domain. Anxiety and self-concept which were not reported to correlate with L1 listening comprehension were found to display large correlations with listening comprehension in L2. Overall, it was found that listening comprehension in both L1 and L2 is a multi-faceted process with different types of components involved. (C) 2019 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHacettepe Univ, Elt Depten_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.32601/ejal.651387en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectListening comprehensionen_US
dc.subjectcorrelates of listeningen_US
dc.subjectmeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectcomponential approachen_US
dc.subjectL1 listeningen_US
dc.subjectL2 listeningen_US
dc.titleCorrelates of Listening Comprehension in L1 and L2: A Meta-analysisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEurasian Journal of Applied Linguisticsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnadolu Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage353en_US
dc.identifier.endpage383en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster